TATA Nano - An example of Disruptive Thinking


On January 10 the veil was lifted not only on one secret: Tata Motors, as expected, presented its disruptive innovation of the “One Lakh People´s Car“. The car goes by the name Nano (like Apple´s iPod Nano). At the same time large German automobile suppliers such as Bosch and Continental reveiled to what an extent they are involved in the disruptive innovation Tata Nano via their Indian subsidiaries. On this occasion India once more presents itself as an innovation centre. But what about Volkswagen´s innovation strategy ?

Tata Motors has fulfilled its promise. In its standard version the Nano will only cost about one Lakh = 100.000 Rupees or about 2.000 Euro. A price that so far no one could imagine as feasible. Having said this, one must add that the outer appearance of the Nano is really pleasant.

 Disruptive Innovation Tata Nano 

Figure.: Disruptive Innovation Tata Motors Standard Version

 

The innovation of the Tata Nano seems custom-tailored for the Indian market and other emerging countries. Through this disruptive innovation the chairman of Tata Motors, Ratan Tata, wanted to find a solution for the Indian family of four members. His consumer insight was that this family oftentimes is traveling on India´s streets with all four members somehow sitting on an unsafe motor-cycle. It should be possible, so he thought, to fulfill the need of this family for a safer and more comfortable transportation means in an affordable way.

The solution is now the Tata Nano, born by the innovation centre India and by the new innovation machine Tata Motors. Ratan Tata compares the Nano with the low-priced disruptive innovation of the Swatch watch in the watch market.

The Nano meets the Indian safety standards, in particular it is said to have passed the crash-tests from the front, the rear and the sides. The Nano fulfills the local emission norm Bharat III and the Euro- 4 emission norm, respectively. By doing this, the Nano is claiming to cause less emissions than an Indian motor-cycle. The gasoline consumption is a bit below 5 liters per hundred kilometers. This does not qualify for world championship in low gas consumption but is still a very good consumption value.

How did Tata Motors manage to make such a disruptive innovation happen at this price ? The following main factors have contributed to this:

  • Focus on the essentials: as the current motor-cycle and scooter drivers are the main target  group the Nano does without some expensive parts such as air bag (but it has seat-belts), ABS, car radio, power-steering and electric window lifts. Furthermore there is no air-conditioning in the standard model but in the luxury version.

  • Creative innovative break-through thinking about product and business model. E.g. the speedometer is placed in the middle of the dashboard so that the same dashboard can be used for car versions with right-hand steering and left-hand steering. The door handles and door mechanisms aer identical on the right side and the left side of the car, once more in order drive the cost degression via scale. Tata Motos plans to decentralize the assembly of the Nano to a large extent and to involve independent franchisees in that.

  • Efficiency increases of the processes. E.g. 30-40% of the Nano´s parts are being purchased via internet auctions. Metal parts are partly replaced by plastic parts that are not welded together but rather glued together.

  • Unbeatable low wage costs at the innovation centre India.

German automobile suppliers play an important part in the Nano. It was already known that BASF contributes plastic parts to this disruptive innovation. To what a large extent Bosch and Continental participate in the Nano, this is the big surprise. Both companies have in the meantime developed their Indian subsidiaries into low-cost innovation centres. Bosch is equipping the Nano with fuel-injection technology, braking-system and car elecronics via its Indian subsidiary Mico. Bosch is said to provide about ten percent of the Nano components. Contintental contributes the gasoline pump and the fill-level sensor to the Nano from its Indian innovation centre and factory.

 

Given this large German share in the Nano, the question arises: and what is Volkswagen up to in India? How is it using the innovation centre India? Until today Volkswagen has very little presence in India, in particular in the ultra-low-cost segment. According to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Volkswagen wants to compete in this segment. At the most recent IAA, Volkswagen presented the concept car “Up”. This car meets the most modern environmental requirements, and it should cost about 9000 Euro. But it is exactly this price which demonstrates that the “Up” will not be a serious competitor in the ultra-low-cost segment. A price of 9000 Euro would make the “Up” cost four and half times the price of the Tata Nano. The “Up” would therefore compete in a very different segment with an evidently much lower sales potential.

Fact is that Volkswagen is suffering from a serious time delay vis-a-vis Tata Motors in the ultra-low-cost segment. “Low cost demands maximum innovation capabilites. This fits well to a German company”, Bosch´s division head Scheider says. Why has Volkswagen so far not seen it the same way? VW spokesman Schröder opines that VW so far cannot imagine itself surfing the “wave of cheapness” as some of its competitors are doing. “We are looking through the European glasses, and try to transfer our know-how to India”. I suppose that this will turn out to be the wrong pair of glasses. For the Indian market and the local Indian needs rather the Indian glasses should be put on, and the specific advantages of the innovation centre India should be exploited. Somewhere else a VW spokesman is quoted saying that VW would not be able to realize such an Indian car like the Nano. The explanation: “Because our engineers are not capable of such technically lateral thinking as the Indians”. It is for this very reason that innovation leaders such as the innovation machine SAP or the innovation machine GE or Cisco transfered their respective innovation centre for low-cost products to markets such as India already some time ago, and why they employ local engineers at those locations who are used to this local ultra-low-cost mindset and who know the Indian market and its consumers inside out.

The comments made concerning Volkswagen´s innovation strategy certainly apply in a similar form to the yet unclear innovation strategy of the innovation machine Toyota.

Meanwhile Tata Motors is about to establish itself as a new innovation machine in the car market. On the innovation platform of the Tata Nano, Tata Motors is not only introducing a luxury version with e.g. air-conditioning but it is planning to also launch incremental innovations such as Nano versions with more powerful motors, with Diesel engines, with automatic transmission etc. in order to broadly occupy the ultra-low-cost segment. And then there are still Tata´s innovation concepts of hybrid cars, above all the radical innovation of a hybrid car with a combined compressed air + gasoline engine, which is being developed together with the small French company MDI. The Western car companies will have many reasons to beware.

 

(c) Rolf-Christian Wentz

Sources:

  • Christensen CM: The Innovator´s Dilemma. Boston 1996
  • tata.com
  • Sümeg A: Tatas Billig-Auto. Deutsche Autobauer dürfen Trend nicht verschlafen, süddeutsche.de Jan.14, 2008
  • Nussbaum B: India´s Tata Leads Car Innovation – But Is It The Right Innovation? businessweek.com Jan.8, 2008
  • o.V.: Billig-Auto. Deutscher Konzern verdient am Tata kräftig mit. Welt Online Jan.10, 2008
  • o.V.: Revolution of vier schmalen Reifen. FAZ Jan.11, 2008
  • Delekat T: Der Nano soll Indien mobil machen. Die Welt Jan.11, 2008
  • Wihofszki O, Dohms HR, Gorgs C: Bosch bestückt Billigautos, FT Deutschland, Jan.11, 2008
  • o.V.: Continental als Zulieferer an indischem „Volksauto“ beteiligt, Berliner Morgenpost Online, Jan.11, 2008
  • Why has Wikipedia succeeded?

    In line with Berno's link (http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2006/09/a_fork_in_wikip.php), here are two of the better of many, many articles which have tried to get to the bottom of how Wikipedia manages to stay coherent when so many other crowd sourcing projects ultimately become little more than gibberish.

    Slate traces the history of wikipedia through the Jesus entry: http://www.slate.com/id/2281294/

    Spiegel has a long article which explains the inner workings of the wikipedia process by looking at the entry for the Danube Tower:  http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,690402,00.html

    Crowd sourcing ideas for national intel

    The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (USA) is sponsoring a prediction tournament in which "each team will develop its own tools for harnessing and improving collective intelligence and will be judged on how well its forecasters predict major trends and events around the world over the next four years."  The tournament will be administered by  the University of Pennsylvania and the University of California Berkeley.   US citizens are invited to sign up. More info here.  [H/T NYT]
    - sezflom

    HBS/HBR on Innovation this week

    Here are two interesting pieces.

    The first is about Singapore and government backing a venture which should have failed.  It is written by Scott Anthony who has written some books with HBS (Disruptive) Innovation Guru Clayton Christensen and works for Innosight - a company founded by Christensen.  There is a book by Josh Lerner on government efforts at venture capital which I had to stop reading (temporarily I hope) because it could have been better written:  Boulevard of Broken Dreams

    The second is a Q&A on HBS Working Knowledge with Gary Pisano and Willy Shih who have earlier argued that manufacturing is essential for the U.S. if it wants to continue to innovate.  So they think its not too late to bring manufacturing back and also suggest that the U.S. should have a coordinated national economic strategy (Mike Porter says the same thing).  Unfortunately they don't tell us how this would happen and what government might do to discourage outsourcing.  And of course - they completely miss out consumers.

    Innovation by Govt: Panic button

    The US State Department is working promoting a "panic button" application that pro-democracy campaigners can press to "wipe out the phone's address book and emit emergency alerts ot other activists" reports NYT.  Apparently there's been a specific budget ($50m since 2008) for promoting technologies for social activists, particularly "circumvention" technology.  There has also been training in new technologies.  The obvious concern here comes back to the old adage: one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.  
    - sezflom

    Homer-Dixon takes a dig at Negroponte

    This is a cut-paste from:

    The Ingenuity Gap:  Facing the Economic, Environmental, and Other Challenges of an Increasingly Complex and Unpredictable Future
    Thomas Homer-Dixon
    PhD Political Science, MIT

    I don't know if anyone should read this book … he writes ...

    "The people who work in political science are, for the most part, well-intentioned and smart."  *but*  "They have largely failed to produce any really valuable knowledge."

    "Economics certainly deserves to be regarded as the queen of social sciences; unlike the others, it has unquestionably produced useful knowledge on a wide range of issues that affect our daily lives."

    … Thanks but some of us have always known that!

    Of course he is partly wrong (and I hope he is completely wrong) since we know from an earlier post that uneducated poor kids can use computers without being taught how to do so.  I continue to admire Negroponte's persistence.